Starting with the fundamentals, let’s delve into the definition of “peace.”
According to the dictionary, “peace” signifies “freedom from disturbance; tranquillity; a state or period devoid of war or post-war circumstances.” Peace embodies the serene ambiance of a quiet library or a cozy embrace. It represents the calm interlude between taking the first sip of a much-craved drink and realizing the shift from welcoming silence to a suspicious stillness.
Contrary to the essence of peace stands Donald Trump, persistently vying for the Nobel Peace Prize despite his demeanor. While various global leaders endorse his bid, it is noteworthy that many of these proponents are oppressive rulers. Notably, historical figures like Hitler, though facetiously, were nominated for the peace prize. However, Trump, lacking any sense of humor, avidly pursues recognition akin to Augustus Gloop’s desire for all the Cadbury’s Biscoffs after allegedly securing a potential Gaza peace agreement.
The predicament lies in the fact that the Nobel Prize is bestowed upon individuals who significantly contribute to fostering camaraderie among nations, reducing military forces, and advocating for peace conferences. It is not designated for individuals who incite geopolitical turmoil with every action.
Trump’s contentious nature evokes widespread indignation, fueling intense fury among people globally. Those in agreement with him display incensed reactions, potentially resorting to extreme measures, while dissenters could exhibit erratic behavior, possibly escalating to hostile actions.
His directives precipitated internal strife by deploying armed forces in US urban areas, where law enforcement resorted to violence against journalists. Trump’s pursuit of curbing freedom of expression and manipulation of the legal system against accusers reveal a concerning pattern of behavior.
Trump’s disruptive policies, exemplified by trade conflicts and governmental shutdowns, engendered instability both domestically and internationally. His erratic decisions, such as attacking fishing vessels off South America, have strained diplomatic relations with neighboring countries.
Despite Trump’s persistent nomination pursuits, the Nobel Committee remains unconvinced that an individual resorting to social media outbursts in capital letters embodies the epitome of global peace.
Trump’s actions have alienated allies, antagonized Canada, and transformed international forums into confrontational spectacles. His demeanor and policies evoke a sense of chaos and discord rather than unity and cooperation.
Trump’s belligerent conduct and disregard for conventional diplomatic norms accentuate his unsuitability for a peace accolade. His tenure is marked by a trail of conflicts and controversies, indicating a stark departure from the attributes typically associated with Nobel Peace Prize laureates.
Ultimately, the notion of awarding Trump a peace prize is met with widespread skepticism, as his actions and rhetoric have perpetuated division and distrust rather than fostering harmony and stability on a global scale.